I did not want to use my blog space to get involved in this whole field of disputes and divisions as aggressive as they have been and are still these elections. All I've seen over the virtual media in the last days of the first lap and corresponding to the second is a series of messages atosigantes one hand, and too full of hatred for the other. No one escapes and has run away with insulting or being insulted. I have participated in forums in which most people in the group supported a candidate who was not my sympathy and a sensible flow of the ideas was becoming a media nightmare, I have seen two forums of people of my former college and the thing is pathetic. Failure by a candidate sympathetic has made you a kind of "plague" and even categorized by many people, mostly teenagers, who have no idea of \u200b\u200bwhat is "democracy." Many people I know belong to a social circle, economic and cultural is privileged to have had (and have) better education. But seeing them almost as fanatics, intolerant and intransigent I prefer silence. Some thoughts wise have come from various people, friends or acquaintances of mine, but they are few. The polarization that has come you rail against a person who embodies a political movement, as if she were to blame. If they had made another flat logic which has argued in recent weeks had been guilty. I can not disagree. In a way, their arguments to blame the candidate, Ollanta, are applied by them: authoritarianism, resentment and failure.
If we see these three great hypernyms or macro words - if it fits the term ", contain all that these people have distilled over the first and, so far, the second round.
Authoritarianism in their thinking in one direction, they are correct, there are no other possibilities. His truth is incredibly unique and should be accepted at face value. This is their concept of democracy (!)
There is a strong resentment of a social group of several people who want to belong to him, is an almost visceral hatred, not so long ago viewed as strong racist semantic charges, many psychoanalysts will have an interesting field of study in this violent society that has evolved in the past 20 years. In fact, the economic gap in our country has moved to all fields, dangerously, again, dangerously. Worse, the media and the institutions that should invoke the political reason merely stir him up with some projections that may not have been measured (or does she?). And the resentment is right: the former spokesman for the advocacy group a way of thinking, Mario Vargas Llosa, has suddenly fallen in disgrace because he wanted to be consistent in their thinking, in a nation where consistency has lost its way. The tarnish and even the opposition to a middling writer such as Jaime Bayly. Personally, I sympathize MVLL, but his act dignified in our society you want to delete all the past of a government that did everything they're blaming Ollanta: staying in power (Fujimori was almost 11 years had it not been for the Vladivideos) pulled down the economy (and we forget about the recession of 98-99), cut the freedom of the press (this is the most laughter given, unless they have some seriously outstanding balance of the past), cut civil rights (are we at that time, except for a group of people? .) Mario Vargas Llosa was mistreated by the government and as many people who lost jobs and saw their savings disappear mismanagement. The environment surrounding the candidate remains and has its fair MVLL questions (such as all) that has the ability to govern our country, if not with an iron hand, tyrannical, as he liked (and like) people: a peace of the cemetery. An example we are already seeing the fire leading journalists not fit into future plans in a possible government of the candidate. In the new work is understood, but say goodbye to inefficient, not made you become an emblem of the free press.
I close with the disability, I believe that we have experienced permanent virtual path. The inability to hear the other, to tolerate divergent ways of thinking. A student at a class at the university said too loose bone Arguedas what we read which is of cholos and mountain, the teacher had the good sense to clarify the ideas that young girl, whose physical traits of the Andean world nearer to the dream of "first world." She was, perhaps, a spokeswoman for the silent mass of young people who have been poisoned your mind with total denial of who we are. Hard work to do in education.
Hope on 06 June, after the election hangover, Peruvians we rise to heal the wounds that are causing this intense period. That does not make neither one nor the other candidate, we have to start us. Hopefully we can.
If we see these three great hypernyms or macro words - if it fits the term ", contain all that these people have distilled over the first and, so far, the second round.
Authoritarianism in their thinking in one direction, they are correct, there are no other possibilities. His truth is incredibly unique and should be accepted at face value. This is their concept of democracy (!)
There is a strong resentment of a social group of several people who want to belong to him, is an almost visceral hatred, not so long ago viewed as strong racist semantic charges, many psychoanalysts will have an interesting field of study in this violent society that has evolved in the past 20 years. In fact, the economic gap in our country has moved to all fields, dangerously, again, dangerously. Worse, the media and the institutions that should invoke the political reason merely stir him up with some projections that may not have been measured (or does she?). And the resentment is right: the former spokesman for the advocacy group a way of thinking, Mario Vargas Llosa, has suddenly fallen in disgrace because he wanted to be consistent in their thinking, in a nation where consistency has lost its way. The tarnish and even the opposition to a middling writer such as Jaime Bayly. Personally, I sympathize MVLL, but his act dignified in our society you want to delete all the past of a government that did everything they're blaming Ollanta: staying in power (Fujimori was almost 11 years had it not been for the Vladivideos) pulled down the economy (and we forget about the recession of 98-99), cut the freedom of the press (this is the most laughter given, unless they have some seriously outstanding balance of the past), cut civil rights (are we at that time, except for a group of people? .) Mario Vargas Llosa was mistreated by the government and as many people who lost jobs and saw their savings disappear mismanagement. The environment surrounding the candidate remains and has its fair MVLL questions (such as all) that has the ability to govern our country, if not with an iron hand, tyrannical, as he liked (and like) people: a peace of the cemetery. An example we are already seeing the fire leading journalists not fit into future plans in a possible government of the candidate. In the new work is understood, but say goodbye to inefficient, not made you become an emblem of the free press.
I close with the disability, I believe that we have experienced permanent virtual path. The inability to hear the other, to tolerate divergent ways of thinking. A student at a class at the university said too loose bone Arguedas what we read which is of cholos and mountain, the teacher had the good sense to clarify the ideas that young girl, whose physical traits of the Andean world nearer to the dream of "first world." She was, perhaps, a spokeswoman for the silent mass of young people who have been poisoned your mind with total denial of who we are. Hard work to do in education.
Hope on 06 June, after the election hangover, Peruvians we rise to heal the wounds that are causing this intense period. That does not make neither one nor the other candidate, we have to start us. Hopefully we can.
0 comments:
Post a Comment